Joao Eduardo Schiessl vs Philip Hjorth Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 May at 12:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Eduardo Schiessl vs P. Hjorth

BRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schiessl 2 - 0 Hjorth
They have played 5 sets in total, with Joao Eduardo Schiessl winning 4 and Philip Hjorth winning 1. The last match between Joao Eduardo Schiessl and Philip Hjorth was at the M15 Warmbad Villach, 27-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Joao Eduardo Schiessl getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schiessl | 2 |
| Hjorth | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Warmbad Villach(05-27-25)
(Q3) M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(02-20-24)
J. E. Schiessl vs P. Hjorth H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.59% (133-94) | Career Total W/L | 50.78% (65-63) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. E. Schiessl vs P. Hjorth Match Preview:
- In recent form, Schiessl's second serve performance is slightly better than Hjorth's, with Schiessl winning 43.23% of points compared to Hjorth's 40.63%.
- Hjorth has shown a stronger return game on opponents' second serve, winning 47.15% of those points versus Schiessl's 42.12%.
- Both players have comparable return stats on first serves, with Schiessl's rate at 29.38% and Hjorth's at 27.43%.
- Under pressure, Schiessl saves more breakpoints (54.01%) than Hjorth (52.15%), which could be crucial in tight situations.
- Over the past year, Schiessl has a higher match win rate at 55.93% compared to Hjorth's 48.15%.
- Which surface favors which player? Schiessl excels on Clay with a 57% win rate, while Hjorth prefers Hard courts with a 59% win rate.
- In the past head-to-head encounter, Schiessl has a 1-0 record against Hjorth, winning two out of three sets played.
- How do they perform in tight matches? Schiessl has won a deciding set against Hjorth in their sole H2H encounter.
- Interestingly, Hjorth has won the only tiebreak they've played against each other.
- Despite competing against higher-ranked opponents on average, Hjorth has a lower deciding set win rate than Schiessl in the last 12 months.
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the upcoming match, recent performance indicators suggest that Schiessl has a slight edge. Although both players exhibit comparable abilities in certain areas, Schiessl tends to outperform Hjorth, particularly under pressure and in deciding sets.
While Hjorth demonstrates stronger return statistics on second serves, Schiessl compensates with a firm hold under pressure, reflected in a slightly higher breakpoint save rate. Additionally, Schiessl's overall superior match win rate suggests more consistent form.
Their prior encounter also saw Schiessl emerging victorious, hinting at psychological leverage. Considering all available data, Schiessl appears to be the likely winner of this match, albeit with the potential for a tightly contested game.
Joao Eduardo Schiessl vs Philip Hjorth Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. E. Schiessl vs P. Hjorth H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 34 | Games Won | 19 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:37:44 | Average Match Time | 1:37:44 |
| 68% (90/132) | 1st Serve % | 62% (80/129) |
| 71% (64/90) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (49/80) |
| 60% (25/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (24/49) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Pts Won % | 10% (1/10) |
| 43% (56/129) | Return Points Win % | 33% (43/132) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. E. Schiessl Recent Matches Played
P. Hjorth Recent Matches Played

J. E. Schiessl vs P. Hjorth Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.59% (133/94) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.78% (65/63) |
| 58.13% (304/219) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.98% (156/133) |
| 52.96% (2610/2318) | Games Win/Loss | 52.51% (1371/1240) |
| 55.26% (21/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.57% (41/29) |
| 59.26% (112/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.00% (22/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 348 | Aces Total | 131 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 365 | Total Double Faults | 251 |
| 1:29:53 | Average Match Time | 1:1:42 |
| 384.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 299.43 |
| 66% (8448/12818) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3355/5131) |
| 65% (5517/8448) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2191/3355) |
| 49% (2147/4370) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (843/1776) |
| 46% (608/1325) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (210/501) |
| 41% (5276/12722) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2027/5099) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 40.74% (11/16) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 61.00% (122/78) | Futures W/L | 51.59% (65/61) |
| 59% (133/226) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (65/125) |
| 57% (29/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (13/20) |
| 46% (32/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 28% (10/36) |
| 89% (127/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (80/60) |
| 11% (127/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (80/20) |
| 20% (100/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (48/5) |